Iconik Review vs. Frame.io: Which video collaboration platform is right for your team?

A comprehensive comparison to help you choose the right media collaboration tool.

Between our Iconik team and our customers, we have a lot of experience using Frame and Iconik for media collaboration and management. TL;DR: If project-level feedback inside your browser is all you need, Frame.io is a good choice. If you need end-to-end media operations – media review plus asset governance, bring-your-own-storage (BYOS), and cost-effective workflows with enterprise-grade security, Iconik is the tool for you.

Key differences at a glance

Let’s dive deeper into the differences. 
‍

Which media collaboration tool is best for review and approval?

There are plenty of options for adding comments or sending messages about an asset, including Frame, Iconik, email, and Slack. The real question is: how do you align and move forward when the pressure is on to deliver outstanding creative on a tight deadline?

Context vs. comments

Media professionals, clients, and stakeholders need to locate the asset they need, land on the right version, and carry decisions forward without rework. That means collaboration must extend beyond an edit timeline or review session and into a global media management system.

Platforms like Frame.io have revolutionized how editors collect feedback on video projects that are in-progress, upping the game for in-the-moment review and approval.

But modern teams also need lifecycle-wide media operations. Iconik offers interactive, live review sessions alongside async comment threads that live with your original files. The desktop app goes beyond the browser so you can review media in greater detail. Assets, feedback, approvals, versions, rights, and metadata travel together, so decisions stay in a single platform.
‍

How do features and functionalities compare across Frame.io and Iconik?

True collaboration for modern media teams extends across the entire content workflow. Here are some things to consider when choosing a tool.

Decisive alignment: Live and async comments in one thread 

Async comments are essential, but async-only falls short. Traditional project-review tools log comments and stack versions, but feedback mostly stays trapped inside project review. When your colorist, director, and client all see the same frame at the same moment, ideas build in real time. That creative energy, combined with async notes in the same timeline, speeds consensus and reduces revision cycles without spinning up side channels. 

Beyond just comments, context matters too. In a global media platform, all context lives with each file. That means version history, collaborators, comments, AI-enriched metadata, rights and usage history, all in one place.

One system of record for every asset

Collaboration that ends at export creates inefficient review cycles: lost context, duplicate libraries, unnecessary storage costs, and approvals you can’t audit later. Once a project is done, context and approvals are lost from your full library. Iconik keeps documents, comments, approvals, and shares tied directly to your original assets, wherever they live, so you can find and repurpose assets, maximizing their long-term value.

Right-fidelity decisions: Proxy to master

Proxy review workflows are convenient and work great for many situations. Both Frame and Iconik offer proxy review in your browser of choice. However, Iconik’s Desktop Player (currently in beta) enables master-quality review on files unplayable via browser (EXRs, ProRes 4444, HDR) on calibrated monitors. Colorists and editors can review original files while clients view proxies, giving you one shared thread across distributed teams and devices. Quality calls happen on the real picture. Everyone’s viewing the same frame, at the same time, at the right quality for each role.
‍

Cutting down storage costs and file transfer time

Frame.io operates as a cloud-hosted solution in a single ecosystem, which may cause the need to re-ingest assets, creating duplicate copies and higher storage costs. Walled-garden platforms tie you to their storage model, so costs scale with their pricing rather than your strategy.

Iconik supports bring-your-own-storage (BYOS) across on-prem and multiple clouds, without re-ingest or duplication, so your assets stay where you need them, when you need them. Teams avoid copy/transfer churn and keep total cost of media ownership predictable.

For example, a media team at a multinational brand needs a single workspace where they can store raw files, access those files to create new video content, upload the content, bring stakeholders in to review and approve each version, and then tag and store those new versions, without overspending on storage and switching between tools.  

Morning Brew, Inc. consolidated three siloed tools for media transferring and review, including Frame.io, and cut media costs by 69% by switching to Iconik's unified approach.

Beyond storage, look for a video collaboration platform that allows for unlimited collaborators and offers enterprise-level pricing. 
‍

AI-powered enrichment and automation

Frame.io focuses on streamlining the review process with some basic automation features. Other tools stop at project review, leaving archives under-tagged, hard to search, and effectively lost after delivery.

Iconik's rich AI metadata makes archives instantly usable. AI-powered object detection, face recognition, transcription, and translation turn raw footage into searchable, reusable assets without manual tagging. This transforms your historical content from a cost center into a revenue-generating asset library.
‍

Iconik’s open integrations system vs. Frame’s Adobe-native ecosystem

Adobe-native integrations are excellent for project review. For end-to-end operations, also look for:

• Open APIs/webhooks to orchestrate ingest→enrich→distribute
• AI transcription/auto-tagging for searchability
• Automated proxy/transcode pipelines
• Business-system hooks (DAM/CRM/marketing/PM tools) so media isn’t an island.

Iconik’s open approach lets teams automate beyond review, connecting creative and business workflows across the content supply chain.

To consider: Do you need a tool that primarily fits into your editing workflow, or one that can orchestrate your entire media operation from capture to distribution and archive?

End the manual review shuffle

Find → download → upload → share → wait → chase feedback → repeat. That’s not collaboration, it’s logistics. This disconnected chain is a shuffle that wastes hours daily and creates confusion with every handoff.  

In Iconik, review happens where your media lives. No file shuffles. Every comment, approval, and decision is embedded into the original. Your team spends time creating, not moving files.
‍

Choosing your best video collaboration model

If your organization is an Adobe-heavy environment and your primary need is editor-centric, project-bound review, Frame.io is a great choice. 

If you’re thinking long term, you need more than just feedback features. You need a future-proof media platform that includes review and lifecycle management, intelligent organization, scalable and flexible storage, governance, and master-quality decisions in one place, so you can drive value from all of your content.

Choosing the best video collaboration platform depends on how broadly your organization defines collaboration — and whether your strategy demands a tool for specific project review or a holistic system to manage, enrich, and unlock the full potential of your entire media library.

See the full Iconik vs. Frame.io breakdown right here.

Book a demo and get a TCO analysis.